We use the New Keynesian continuous-time framework to theoretically investigate the effects of a lag in a central bank’s response to economic fluctuations (i.e., monetary policy lag) on local equilibrium determinacy. In the case of a policy without lag, equilibrium is indeterminate even though a central bank’s policy response is sufficiently active. However, in the case of a policy with lag, an active monetary policy can contribute to local equilibrium determinacy if the lag is modest.
Published in |
International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 3, Issue 2-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Economic Theory and Its Applications |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14 |
Page(s) | 15-22 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Money in the Production Function (MIPF) Model, Policy Lag, System of Delay Differential Equations, Monetary Policy Rule, Taylor Principle
[1] | T. Asada and H. Yoshida, “Stability, instability and complex behavior in macrodynamic models with policy lag,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 5(4), pp.281–295, 2001. |
[2] | R. E. Bellman and K. L. Cooke, Differential-Difference Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1963. |
[3] | J. Benhabib, S. Schmitt-Grohé, and M. Uribe, “Monetary policy and multiple equilibria,” American Economic Review, vol. 91(1), pp.167–186, 2001. |
[4] | J. Benhabib, S. Schmitt-Grohé, and M. Uribe, “Backward-looking interest-rate rules, interest-rate smoothing, and macroeconomic instability,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 35(6), pp.1379–1412, 2003. |
[5] | B. S. Bernanke and M. Woodford, “Inflation forecasts and monetary policy,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 29(4), pp.653–684, 1997. |
[6] | F. O. Bilbiie, “Limited asset markets participation, monetary policy and (inverted) aggregate demand logic,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 140(1), pp.162–196, 2008. |
[7] | O. J. Blanchard and N. Kiyotaki, “Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand,” American Economic Review, vol. 77(4), pp.647–666, 1987. |
[8] | E. F. Buffie, “The Taylor principle fights back, part I,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 37, pp.2771–2795, 2013. |
[9] | C. T. Carlstrom and T. S. Fuerst, “Forward-looking versus backward-looking Taylor rules,” FRB Cleveland, no. 0009, 2000. |
[10] | C. T. Carlstrom and T. S. Fuerst, “Comment on “Backward-looking interest-rate rules, interest-rate smoothing, and macroeconomic instability” by Jess Benhabib,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 35(6), pp.1413–1423, 2003. |
[11] | C. T. Carlstrom and T. S. Fuerst, “Asset prices, nominal rigidities, and monetary policy,” Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 10(2), pp.256–275, 2007. |
[12] | A. K. Dixit and J. E. Stiglitz, “Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity,” American Economic Review, vol. 67(3), pp.297–308, 1977. |
[13] | R. C. Feenstra, “Functional equivalence between liquidity costs and the utility of money,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 17(2), pp.271–291, 1986. |
[14] | M. Friedman, “A monetary and fiscal framework for economic stability,” American Economic Review, vol. 38(3), pp.245–264, 1948. |
[15] | J. Galí, Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, Princeton University Press, 2008. |
[16] | G. Gandolfo, Economic Dynamics, 4th ed., Springer-Verlag, 2010. |
[17] | A. Matsumoto and F. Szidarovszky, “An elementary study of a class of dynamic systems with two time delays,” Cubo (Temuco), vol. 14(3), pp.103–113, 2012. |
[18] | J. J. Rotemberg, “Sticky prices in the United States,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 90(6), pp.1187–1211, 1982. |
[19] | J. B. Taylor, “Discretion versus policy rules in practice,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 39, pp.195–214, North-Holland, 1993. |
[20] | E. Tsuzuki, “Unimodality of a weight function in backward-looking interest-rate rules and determinacy of equilibrium,” Keizaironsyu, vol. 100, pp.147–171, The Economics Society, Daito Bunka University, 2013. |
[21] | E. Tsuzuki, “A New Keynesian model with delay: Monetary policy lag and determinacy of equilibrium,” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 44(3), pp.279–291, 2014. |
[22] | E. Tsuzuki and T. Inoue, “Technological change and monetary policy in a sticky-price model,” Research in Economics, vol. 65(3), pp.180–194, 2011. |
[23] | C. E. Walsh, Monetary Theory and Policy, 3rd ed., MIT Press, 2010. |
[24] | M. Woodford, Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy, Princeton University Press, 2003. |
[25] | H. Yoshida and T. Asada, “Dynamic analysis of policy lag in a Keynes–Goodwin model: Stability, instability, cycles and chaos,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 62(3), pp.441–469, 2007. |
APA Style
Eiji Tsuzuki. (2015). Determinacy of Equilibrium in a New Keynesian Model with Monetary Policy Lag. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(2-1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14
ACS Style
Eiji Tsuzuki. Determinacy of Equilibrium in a New Keynesian Model with Monetary Policy Lag. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2015, 3(2-1), 15-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14
AMA Style
Eiji Tsuzuki. Determinacy of Equilibrium in a New Keynesian Model with Monetary Policy Lag. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2015;3(2-1):15-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14, author = {Eiji Tsuzuki}, title = {Determinacy of Equilibrium in a New Keynesian Model with Monetary Policy Lag}, journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization}, volume = {3}, number = {2-1}, pages = {15-22}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14}, abstract = {We use the New Keynesian continuous-time framework to theoretically investigate the effects of a lag in a central bank’s response to economic fluctuations (i.e., monetary policy lag) on local equilibrium determinacy. In the case of a policy without lag, equilibrium is indeterminate even though a central bank’s policy response is sufficiently active. However, in the case of a policy with lag, an active monetary policy can contribute to local equilibrium determinacy if the lag is modest.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Determinacy of Equilibrium in a New Keynesian Model with Monetary Policy Lag AU - Eiji Tsuzuki Y1 - 2015/01/22 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14 T2 - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization JF - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization JO - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization SP - 15 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7616 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.14 AB - We use the New Keynesian continuous-time framework to theoretically investigate the effects of a lag in a central bank’s response to economic fluctuations (i.e., monetary policy lag) on local equilibrium determinacy. In the case of a policy without lag, equilibrium is indeterminate even though a central bank’s policy response is sufficiently active. However, in the case of a policy with lag, an active monetary policy can contribute to local equilibrium determinacy if the lag is modest. VL - 3 IS - 2-1 ER -