| Peer-Reviewed

The Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Firm-Level Inflation Expectations in Japan

Received: 16 March 2015     Accepted: 30 March 2015     Published: 13 April 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This paper examines inflation dynamics in Japan through estimations of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve. The estimation with the observed inflation rate in the corporate goods price index and that with the estimated firm-level expected inflation rate are considered. The firm-level expected inflation rate is estimated by the Kanoh (2006)-type extended Carlson-Parkin method. In addition, the validity of the pure forward-looking New Keynesian Phillips Curve and the implication of the flattening of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve are taken into account as the underlying points of interest. Consequently, our empirical study leads us to the following conclusions. First, the backward-looking factor has a dominant impact on inflation dynamics compared with the future element. Second, the forward-looking element has an unignorable effect on the inflation process, even though it is weaker than the backward-looking factor. Third, our result implies the incompleteness of the pure forward-looking New Keynesian Phillips Curve. It gives us the policy implication that the discussion of monetary policy should include a certain degree of emphasis on the backward-looking perspective in addition to the forward-looking perspective and must examine inflation persistence, although the forward guidance policy by the central banks is a recent important topic. Fourth, the degree of rationality of firm-level inflation expectations is not sufficient: firms’ inflation expectations might not always be as exact as those made by the rational expectations hypothesis. Lastly, the slope of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve in Japan is very flat in recent years. It implies the Japanese central bank’s current difficulty in conducting monetary policy in that inflation would be less responsive to movements in the measures of aggregate economic activities.

Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 3, Issue 2-1)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Economic Theory and Its Applications

DOI 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20
Page(s) 60-72
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

New Keynesian Phillips Curve, Inflation Dynamics, Inflation Expectation, GMM

References
[1] Branch, William A. (2004), “The Theory of Rationally Heterogeneous Expectations: Evidence from Survey Data on Inflation Expectations,” The Economic Journal, vol. 114, pp. 592-621.
[2] Brissimis, Sophocles, and Nicholas S. Magginas (2008), “Inflation Forecast and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve,” International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 4(2), pp. 1-22.
[3] Calvo, Guillermo (1983), “Staggered Prices in a Utility Maximizing Framework,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 12(3), pp. 383-398.
[4] Carlson, John A., and Michael Parkin (1975), “Inflation Expectations,” Economica, vol. 42(166), pp. 123-138.
[5] Carroll, Christopher D. (2003), “Macroeconomic Expectations of Households and Professional Forecasters,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118(1), pp. 269-298.
[6] Christiano, Lawrence, Eichenbaum, Martin, and Charles Evans (2001), “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy,” NBER Working Paper Series, no. 8403.
[7] Christiano, Lawrence, Eichenbaum, Martin, and Charles Evans (2005), “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 113(1), pp. 1-45.
[8] Clarida, Richard, Galí, Jordi, and Mark Gertler (1999), “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37(4), pp. 1661-1707.
[9] Cragg, John G., and Stephen G. Donald (1993), “Testing Identifiability and Specification in Instrumental Variables Models,” Economic Theory, vol. 9(2), pp. 222-240.
[10] Erceg, Christopher, Henderson, Dale, and Andrew Levin (2000), “Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 46(2), pp. 281-313.
[11] Evans, Martin, and Paul Wachtel (1992), “Inflation Regimes and the Sources of Inflation Uncertainty,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 25(3)-2, pp. 475-511.
[12] Forsells, Magnus, and Geoff Kenny (2004), “The Rationality of Consumers’ Inflation Expectations: Survey-Based Evidence for the Euro Area,” European Central Bank Working Paper, no. 163.
[13] Gábriel, Péter (2010), “Household Inflation Expectations and Inflation Dynamics,” MNB Working Papers, no. 2010/12.
[14] Galí, Jordi (2008), Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[15] Galí, Jordi, and Mark Gertler (1999), “Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Econometric Analysis,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 44(2), pp. 195-222.
[16] Galí, Jordi, Gertler, Mark, and David López-Salido (2001), “European Inflation Dynamics,” European Economic Review, vol. 45(7), pp. 1237-1270.
[17] Galí, Jordi, Gertler, Mark, and David López-Salido (2005), “Robustness of the Estimates of the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 52(6), pp. 1107-1118.
[18] Giannoni, Marc P., and Michael Woodford (2005), “Optimal Inflation-Targeting Rules,” in Bernanke, Ben S., and Michael Woodford, eds., The Inflation-Targeting Debate, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 93-172.
[19] Goodfriend, Marvin, and Robert G. King (1997), “The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy,” in Bernanke, Ben S., and Julio J. Rotemberg, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, vol. 12, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 231-296.
[20] Henzel, Steffen, and Timo Wollmershäuser (2006), “Quantifying Inflation Expectations with the Carlson-Parkin Method – A Survey-Based Determination of the Just Noticeable Difference,” Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, Vol. 2005(3).
[21] Hodrick, Robert J., and Edward C. Prescott (1997), “Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 29(1), pp. 1-16.
[22] Hori, Masahiro, and Akira Terai (2005), “Carlson-Parkin Hou ni yoru Infurekitai no Keisoku to Syomondai” (in Japanese), Keizaibunseki (Economic and Social Research Institute, Japan), no. 175, pp. 167-192.
[23] Kanoh, Satoru (2006), “Chapter 2: Survey Data no Teiryoka,” (in Japanese) in Kanoh, Satoru, Macrokeizaibunseki to Survey Data, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, pp. 11-30.
[24] Kuester, Keith, Müller, Gernot J., and Sarah Stölting (2009), “Is the New Keynesian Phillips Curve Flat?” Economics Letters, vol. 103(1), pp. 39-41.
[25] Lindé, Jesper (2005), “Estimating New-Keynesian Phillips Curves: A Full Information Maximum Likelihood Approach,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 52(6), pp. 1135–1149.
[26] Mark, Nelson C. (2001), International Macroeconomics and Finance – Theory and Econometric Methods – , Oxford: Blackwell.
[27] Maturu, Benjamin, Kisinguh, Kethi, and Isaya Maana (2007), “A New Keynesian Phillips Curve for Kenya,” paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference on Econometric Modeling for Africa organized by the African Econometric Society, held in Cape Town, South Africa, from 4th to 6th July 2007.
[28] Mavroeidis, Sophocles (2004), “Weak Identification of Forward-looking Models in Monetary Economics,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 66(s1), pp. 609-635.
[29] Mazumder, Sandeep (2010), “The New Keynesian Phillips Curve and the Cyclicality of Marginal Cost,” Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 32(3), pp. 747-765.
[30] Newey, Whitney, and Kenneth West (1987), “A Simple, Positive Semi-definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix,” Econometrica, vol. 55(3), pp. 703-708.
[31] Oral, Ece (2013), “Consumer Inflation Expectations in Turkey,” IFC Working Papers (Bank for International Settlements), no. 10.
[32] Rotemberg, Julio J. (1982a), “Sticky Prices in the United States,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 90(6), pp. 1187-1211.
[33] Rotemberg, Julio J. (1982b), “Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 49(4), pp. 517-531.
[34] Rotemberg, Julio J., and Michael Woodford (1997), “An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy,” in Bernanke, Ben S., and Julio. J. Rotemberg, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, vol. 12, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 297-361.
[35] Rotemberg, Julio, and Michael Woodford (1999), “The Cyclical Behavior of Prices and Costs,” in John Taylor and Michael Woodford, eds., Handbook of Macroeconomics, North-Holland: Elsevier, ed. 1, vol. 1(1), ch. 16, pp. 1051-1135.
[36] Rudd, Jeremy, and Karl Whelan (2005a), “Does Labor’s Share Drive Inflation?” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 37(2), pp. 297-312.
[37] Rudd, Jeremy, and Karl Whelan (2005b), “New Tests of the New-Keynesian Phillips Curve,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 52(6), pp. 1167-1181.
[38] Rudd, Jeremy, and Karl Whelan (2006), “Can Rational Expectations Sticky-Price Models Explain Inflation Dynamics?” American Economic Review, vol. 96(1), pp. 303-320.
[39] Rudd, Jeremy, and Karl Whelan (2007), “Modeling Inflation Dynamics: A Critical Review of Recent Research,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 39(s1), pp. 155-170.
[40] Sbordone, Argia (2002), “Prices and Unit Labor Costs: A New Test of Price Stickiness,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 49(2), pp. 265-292.
[41] Sbordone, Argia (2005), “Do Expected Future Marginal Costs Drive Inflation Dynamics?” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 52(6), pp. 1183-1197.
[42] Scheufele, Rolf (2010), “Evaluating the German (New Keynesian) Phillips Curve,” North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 21, pp. 145-164.
[43] Smets, Frank, and Raffeal Wouters (2003), “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area,” Journal of the European Economics Association, vol. 1(5), pp. 1123-1175.
[44] Steinsson, Jon (2003), “Optimal Monetary Policy in an Economy with Inflation Persistence,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 50(7), pp. 1425-1456.
[45] Stock, James H., and Motohiro Yogo (2005), “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression,” in Andrews, Donald W. K., and James H. Stock, eds., Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80-108.
[46] Stock, James H., Wright, Jonathan H., and Motohiro Yogo (2002), “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 20(4), pp. 518-529.
[47] Taylor, John B. (1979), “Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model,” American Economic Review, vol. 69(2), pp. 108-113.
[48] Taylor, John B. (1980), “Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88(1), pp. 1-23.
[49] Thomas, Lloyd B. (1999), “Survey Measures of Expected U.S. Inflation,” Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 13, pp. 125-144.
[50] Verbeek, Marno (2012), A Guide to Modern Econometrics, 4th ed., New York: Wiley.
[51] Walsh, Carl E. (2010), Monetary Theory and Policy, 3rd ed., Cambridge: MIT Press.
[52] Woodford, Michael (1996), “Control of the Public Debt: A Requirement for Price Stability?” NBER Working Paper Series, no. 5684.
[53] Woodford, Michael (2003), Interest and Prices, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[54] Zhang, Chengsi, Osborn, Denise R., and Dong Heon Kim (2009), “Observed Inflation Forecasts and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, Issue 3, pp. 375-398.
[55] Zhang, Chengsi, and Joel Clovis (2010), “The New Keynesian Phillips Curve of Rational Expectations: A Serial Correlation Extension,” Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 37(2), pp. 159-179.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kazuhiko Nakahira. (2015). The Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Firm-Level Inflation Expectations in Japan. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(2-1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kazuhiko Nakahira. The Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Firm-Level Inflation Expectations in Japan. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2015, 3(2-1), 60-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kazuhiko Nakahira. The Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Firm-Level Inflation Expectations in Japan. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2015;3(2-1):60-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20,
      author = {Kazuhiko Nakahira},
      title = {The Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Firm-Level Inflation Expectations in Japan},
      journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
      volume = {3},
      number = {2-1},
      pages = {60-72},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20},
      abstract = {This paper examines inflation dynamics in Japan through estimations of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve. The estimation with the observed inflation rate in the corporate goods price index and that with the estimated firm-level expected inflation rate are considered. The firm-level expected inflation rate is estimated by the Kanoh (2006)-type extended Carlson-Parkin method. In addition, the validity of the pure forward-looking New Keynesian Phillips Curve and the implication of the flattening of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve are taken into account as the underlying points of interest. Consequently, our empirical study leads us to the following conclusions. First, the backward-looking factor has a dominant impact on inflation dynamics compared with the future element. Second, the forward-looking element has an unignorable effect on the inflation process, even though it is weaker than the backward-looking factor. Third, our result implies the incompleteness of the pure forward-looking New Keynesian Phillips Curve. It gives us the policy implication that the discussion of monetary policy should include a certain degree of emphasis on the backward-looking perspective in addition to the forward-looking perspective and must examine inflation persistence, although the forward guidance policy by the central banks is a recent important topic. Fourth, the degree of rationality of firm-level inflation expectations is not sufficient: firms’ inflation expectations might not always be as exact as those made by the rational expectations hypothesis. Lastly, the slope of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve in Japan is very flat in recent years. It implies the Japanese central bank’s current difficulty in conducting monetary policy in that inflation would be less responsive to movements in the measures of aggregate economic activities.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Firm-Level Inflation Expectations in Japan
    AU  - Kazuhiko Nakahira
    Y1  - 2015/04/13
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20
    T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    SP  - 60
    EP  - 72
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7616
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.20
    AB  - This paper examines inflation dynamics in Japan through estimations of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve. The estimation with the observed inflation rate in the corporate goods price index and that with the estimated firm-level expected inflation rate are considered. The firm-level expected inflation rate is estimated by the Kanoh (2006)-type extended Carlson-Parkin method. In addition, the validity of the pure forward-looking New Keynesian Phillips Curve and the implication of the flattening of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve are taken into account as the underlying points of interest. Consequently, our empirical study leads us to the following conclusions. First, the backward-looking factor has a dominant impact on inflation dynamics compared with the future element. Second, the forward-looking element has an unignorable effect on the inflation process, even though it is weaker than the backward-looking factor. Third, our result implies the incompleteness of the pure forward-looking New Keynesian Phillips Curve. It gives us the policy implication that the discussion of monetary policy should include a certain degree of emphasis on the backward-looking perspective in addition to the forward-looking perspective and must examine inflation persistence, although the forward guidance policy by the central banks is a recent important topic. Fourth, the degree of rationality of firm-level inflation expectations is not sufficient: firms’ inflation expectations might not always be as exact as those made by the rational expectations hypothesis. Lastly, the slope of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve in Japan is very flat in recent years. It implies the Japanese central bank’s current difficulty in conducting monetary policy in that inflation would be less responsive to movements in the measures of aggregate economic activities.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 2-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Business Administration and Information, Tokyo University of Science – Suwa, Nagano, Japan

  • Sections