| Peer-Reviewed

Modes of Thinking and Language Change: The Loss of Inflexions in Old English

Received: 25 March 2015     Accepted: 25 March 2015     Published: 8 April 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The changes known as the loss of inflexions in English (11th- 15th centuries, included) were prompted with the introduction of a new mode of thinking. The mode of thinking, for the Anglo-Saxons, was a dynamic way of conceiving of things. Things were considered events happening. With the contacts of Anglo-Saxons with, first, the Romano-British; second, the introduction of Christianity; and finally with the Norman invasion, their dynamic way of thinking was confronted with the static conception of things coming from the Mediterranean. The history of English from the 11th to the 15th century meant the introduction, confrontation and adoption of a new mental conception of things, the static way of conceiving of things, both modes of thinking defining the language today.

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 3, Issue 6-1)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistics of Saying

DOI 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21
Page(s) 85-95
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Modes of Thinking, Modes of Being, Things as Processes, Things as Classes, Idea of Motion, Idea of Place, Idea of Time

References
[1] Barber, Charles. 1995 (1993), The English Language: A Historical Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
[2] Baugh, Albert C, 1971 (1951), A History of the English Language, London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
[3] Benveniste, Emile, Problemas de lingüística general, Siglo XXI Ediciones, 242007 [1971], vol. I, p. 71-72
[4] Blake, N, 1996, A History of the English Language, Macmillan.
[5] Bosworht, J, 1995 (1898), An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Based on the Manuscript Collections of Joseph Bosworth, T, Northcote Toller, ed. Oxford University Press.
[6] Burchfield, Robert, 1985, The English Language, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
[7] Cambridge University Press. The Cambridge History of the English Language, 6 volumes, Cambridge University Press.
[8] Coseriu, Eugenio, 1985 [1977], El hombre y su lenguaje, Madrid: Gredos.
[9] Coseriu, Eugenio, 1987 (1978), Gramática, semántica, universales, Madrid: Gredos.
[10] Coseriu, Eugenio, 1988 (1957), Sincronía, diacronía e historia: el problema del cambio lingüístico, Madrid: Gredos.
[11] Coseriu, Eugenio, 1992 (1988), La competencia lingüística, Madrid: Gredos.
[12] Freeborn, Denis, 1992, From Old English to Standard English: A Course Book in Language Variation across Time, Macmillan: Studies in English Language.
[13] Freeborn, Denis, 1996, Style: Text Analysis and Linguistic Criticism, Macmillan: Studies in English Language.
[14] Martínez del Castillo, Jesús, 2006, Facts of Speech and Facts of Evolution: An Interpretation to the History of the English Language, Abecedario.
[15] Martínez del Castillo, 2012, Psicología, lenguaje y libertad, in Analecta Malacitana, Universidad de Málaga, Anejos/89.
[16] Martínez del Castillo, Jesús, 2013a, Modes of Thinking, Language and Linguistics, in Analecta Malacitana, Universidad de Málaga, Anejos/95.
[17] Martínez del Castillo, Jesús. 2013b. English Semantics and Lexicology. Universidad de Almeria.
[18] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015a. Linguistics of Saying. Presentation. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 1-4.
[19] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015b. The Meaningful Intentional Purpose of the Individual Speaker. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 5-10.
[20] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015c. The Process of Abstraction in the Creation of Meanings. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 11-23.
[21] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015d. Fixing the Construct Created in the Act of Knowing. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 24-30.
[22] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015e. The Speech Act. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 31-38.
[23] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015f. Determining the Degree of Reality of Language. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 39-49.
[24] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015g. Meaning and Language. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015b, pp. 50-58.
[25] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015h. The Activity of Speaking. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 59-66.
[26] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 2015i. Meaning, What Is It. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 67-76.
[27] Martinez del Castillo, Jesús. 1015j. Modes of Thinking in Language Study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Linguistics of Saying. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 77-84.
[28] McArthur, Tom, ed. 1992, The Oxford Companion to the English Language, Oxford University Press.
[29] Onions, C T; W Friedrichsen & R Burchfield, ed, 1966, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford University Press.
[30] Ortega y Gasset, José, Ideas y creencias, Alianza Editorial, 1970 [1940].
[31] Ortega y Gasset, José, La idea de principio en Leibniz o la evolución de la teoría deductiva, Alianza Editorial, 1992a [1958].
[32] Ortega y Gasset, José, ¿Qué es conocimiento?, Alianza Editorial, 1992b [1930].
[33] Ortega y Gasset, José, ¿Qué es filosofía? Alianza Editorial 1994 [1957].
[34] Oxford University Press, 1989, The Oxford English Dictionary, Second edition, Prepared by J, A, Simpson and E, S, C, Weiner, 19 vols, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[35] Partridge, Eric, 1966, Origins, An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[36] Sweet. Henry, Sweet's Anglo-Saxon Primer, Norman Davis, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 91970 (1882)
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jesus Martinez del Castillo. (2015). Modes of Thinking and Language Change: The Loss of Inflexions in Old English. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(6-1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jesus Martinez del Castillo. Modes of Thinking and Language Change: The Loss of Inflexions in Old English. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2015, 3(6-1), 85-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jesus Martinez del Castillo. Modes of Thinking and Language Change: The Loss of Inflexions in Old English. Int J Lang Linguist. 2015;3(6-1):85-95. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21,
      author = {Jesus Martinez del Castillo},
      title = {Modes of Thinking and Language Change: The Loss of Inflexions in Old English},
      journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
      volume = {3},
      number = {6-1},
      pages = {85-95},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2015030601.21},
      abstract = {The changes known as the loss of inflexions in English (11th- 15th centuries, included) were prompted with the introduction of a new mode of thinking. The mode of thinking, for the Anglo-Saxons, was a dynamic way of conceiving of things. Things were considered events happening. With the contacts of Anglo-Saxons with, first, the Romano-British; second, the introduction of Christianity; and finally with the Norman invasion, their dynamic way of thinking was confronted with the static conception of things coming from the Mediterranean. The history of English from the 11th to the 15th century meant the introduction, confrontation and adoption of a new mental conception of things, the static way of conceiving of things, both modes of thinking defining the language today.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Modes of Thinking and Language Change: The Loss of Inflexions in Old English
    AU  - Jesus Martinez del Castillo
    Y1  - 2015/04/08
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21
    T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    SP  - 85
    EP  - 95
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0221
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.21
    AB  - The changes known as the loss of inflexions in English (11th- 15th centuries, included) were prompted with the introduction of a new mode of thinking. The mode of thinking, for the Anglo-Saxons, was a dynamic way of conceiving of things. Things were considered events happening. With the contacts of Anglo-Saxons with, first, the Romano-British; second, the introduction of Christianity; and finally with the Norman invasion, their dynamic way of thinking was confronted with the static conception of things coming from the Mediterranean. The history of English from the 11th to the 15th century meant the introduction, confrontation and adoption of a new mental conception of things, the static way of conceiving of things, both modes of thinking defining the language today.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 6-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Philology, Faculty of Business Studies and Tourism, Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain

  • Sections