In this work, the energy levels of light nuclei from the NU method are calculated and their structures are determined. Therefore, by using a local potential that is suitable for light nuclei and compatible with the Hafstad-Teller potential, the Schrodinger equation from NU method is solved and the energy levels and wave functions are obtained. For more accuracy, the spin-orbit and tensor potentials are added to the central potential as perturbation and the first-order energy correction is obtained for the different states of many alpha systems. So, we calculate the energy levels of nuclei 8Be and 16O and compare the obtained results with the experimental data and get a good agreement. This agreement is better for 16O than 8Be. Therefore, anybody can conclude that the α cluster model has the better results for the nuclei with the number of more alpha particles. Finally, by the strength of Coulomb’s repulsion, it is shown that the ground and first excited states of the 16O nucleus have the tetrahedral and square configurations, respectively. Also, it is obtained that the structures of the second and third excited states are as square and linear chain that these structures show the non-localized gas configuration for the higher excited states of 16O nucleus.
Published in | World Journal of Applied Physics (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11 |
Page(s) | 54-60 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cluster Model, NU Method, Structure of Nuclei, Energy Levels
[1] | G. Gamow, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 126, 632 (1930). |
[2] | G. C. Hanna, alpha radioactivity, in E. Segre, (ed.), “Experimental Nuclear Physics”, vol. 3, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, (1959). |
[3] | Y. Kanada-Enyo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 117, 655 (2007) [Erratum-ibid. 121, 895 (2009)]. |
[4] | Y. Kanada-Enyo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5291 (1998). |
[5] | W. von Oertzen, M. Freer, and Y. Kanada-En’yo, “Nuclear clusters and nuclear molecules,” Phys. Rep., vol. 432, no. 2, pp. 43-113, (2006). |
[6] | H Yépez-Martínez et al, Phys. Rev. C 86, 034309 (2012). |
[7] | H Yépez-Martínez et al, Phys. Rev. C 85, 014316 (2012). |
[8] | P R Fraser et al, Phys. Rev. C 85, 014317 (2012). |
[9] | Y Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C 89, 024302 (2014). |
[10] | Anjana Acharya, and Rajib Lochan Nayak, Int. J. Curr. Res, Vol. 8, pp. 27401-27406, (2016). |
[11] | Jinesh Kallunkathariyil, Zbigniew Sosin, and Andrzej Wieloch, Acta. Phys. Pol. B, 6, 1147-1150 (2013). |
[12] | J. A. Peacock, S. Cole, P. Norberg, C. M. Baugh, J. Bland-Hawthorn, T. Bridges, R. D. Cannon, M. Colless, C. Collins, and W. Couch, ”A measurement of the cosmological mass density from clustering in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey,” Nature, vol. 410, no. 6825, pp. 169-173, (2001). |
[13] | M. Freer and A. C. Merchant, “Developments in the study of nuclear clustering in light even-even nuclei,” J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys., vol. 23, no. 3, p. 261, (1997). |
[14] | M. Freer, “The clustered nucleus-cluster structures in stable and unstable nuclei,” Reports Prog. Phys., vol. 70, no. 12, p. 2149, (2007). |
[15] | M. Freer, “Clusters in nuclei,” Scholarpedia, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 9652, (2010). |
[16] | D. R. Tilley, H. R. Weller, and G. M. Hale, “Energy levels of light nuclei A= 4,” Nucl. Phys. A, vol. 541, no. 1, pp. 1-104, (1992). |
[17] | G. Gamow, “Mass defect curve and nuclear constitution,” Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A, Contain. Pap. a Math. Phys. Character, vol. 126, no. 803, pp. 632-644, (1930). |
[18] | K. Wildermuth and T. Kanellopoulos, “The ‘cluster model’ of the atomic nuclei,” Nucl. Phys., vol. 7, pp. 150-162, (1958). |
[19] | E. Rutherford, “The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom,” Philos. Mag., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 379-398, (2012). |
[20] | Zbigniew Sosin, Jan Błocki, Jinesh Kallunkathariyil, Jerzy Łukasik and Piotr Pawłowski, arXiv:1506.06731 [nucl-th] (2016). |
[21] | L. R. Hafstad and E. Teller, Phys. Rev., vol. 54, no. 9, p.681, (1938). |
[22] | R Machleidt, Scholarpedia 9, 30710 (2014). |
[23] | E Epelbaum et al, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009). |
[24] | J S Hernandez et al, Phys. Rev. D 85, 071301 (2012). |
[25] | E Z Liverts et al, Ann. Phys. 324, 388 (2009). |
[26] | K V Tretiakov et al, Phys. Status Solidi 251, 385 (2014). |
[27] | J C Long et al, Nature 421, 922 (2003). |
[28] | S. Ali and A. R. Bodmer, Nucl. Phys., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 99, (1966). |
[29] | Z. Papp, S. Moszkowski, Mod.Phys.Lett.B, vol. 22 pp. 2201, (2008). |
[30] | LR. Hafstad and E. Teller. Physical Review, 54:681, (1938). |
[31] | D. Baye, P.-H. Heenen, Nucl. Phys. A 233, 304 (1974). |
[32] | D. Baye, P.-H. Heenen, M. Liebert-Heinemann, Nucl. Phys. A 291, 230 (1977). |
[33] | D. Baye, P. Descouvement, in Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Clustering aspects in nuclear and subnuclear systems, Kyoto, Japan, 25th July ed. by K. Ikeda, K. Katori, Y. Suzuki (1988), p. 103 [Supplement to the Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 58 (1989)]. |
[34] | D. Baye, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Clusters in Nuclear Structure and Dynamics, Strasbourg, France, 6th September 1994, ed. by F. Haas (1994), p. 259. |
[35] | A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics (Birkhauser, Bassel, 1988). |
[36] | A. A. Rajabi and M. Hamzavi, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 7 (2013) 7. |
[37] | Taiichi Yamada, Peter Schuck, Phys. Rev. C, 69, 024309 (2004). |
[38] | Bijker, Iachello, Evidence for Tetrahedral Symmetry in 16O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 152501 (2014). |
[39] | E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lahde, D. Lee, U. G. Meisner, and G. Rupak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 102501 (2014). |
[40] | L. Liu and P. W. Zhao, Chin. Phys. C 36, 818 (2012). |
[41] | T. Suhara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112,062501 (2014). |
[42] | M. R. Shojaei, et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 23, 267, (2008). |
[43] | M. R. Shojaei, et al., Inter. Jour. of Mod. Phys. E, 17, 6, (2006). |
[44] | M. M. Giannini, et al., Nucl. Phys. A, 699, 308, (2002). |
[45] | A. H. Al-Ghamdi, Awad A. Ibraheem, M. El-Azab Farid, Commun. Theor. Phys., 58,135-140 (2012). |
[46] | M. A. Hassanain, Awad A. Ibraheem, and M. El-Azab Farid, Phys. Rev. C, 77, 034601 (2008). |
[47] | B. Buck, B. C. Dover, and J. P. Vary, Phys. Rev. C, 11,1803 (1975). |
[48] | B. Buck, H. Friedrich, and C. Wheatley, Nucl. Phys. A, 275, 246, (1977). |
[49] | M. N. A. Abdullah, S. Hossain, M. S. I. Sarker, S. K. Das, A. S. B. Tariq, M. A. Uddin, A. K. Basak, S. Ali, H. M. Sen Gupta, and F. B. Malik, E. Phys. J. A, 18, 65, (2003);S. Hossain, M. N. A. Abdullah, K. M. Hasan, M. Asaduzzaman, M. A. R. Akanda, S. K. Das, A. S. B. Tariq, M. A. Uddin, A. K. Basak, S. Ali, and F. B. Malik, Phys. Lett. B, 636, 248, (2006). |
[50] | D. R. Tilley, H. R. Weller, and C. M. Cheves, Nucl. Phys. A, 564, 1 (1993). |
APA Style
Sahar Aslanzadeh, Mohammad Reza Shojaei, Ali Asghar Mowlavi. (2019). Considering the Light Nuclei in the Cluster Model from NU Method. World Journal of Applied Physics, 3(4), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11
ACS Style
Sahar Aslanzadeh; Mohammad Reza Shojaei; Ali Asghar Mowlavi. Considering the Light Nuclei in the Cluster Model from NU Method. World J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 3(4), 54-60. doi: 10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11
@article{10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11, author = {Sahar Aslanzadeh and Mohammad Reza Shojaei and Ali Asghar Mowlavi}, title = {Considering the Light Nuclei in the Cluster Model from NU Method}, journal = {World Journal of Applied Physics}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {54-60}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjap.20180304.11}, abstract = {In this work, the energy levels of light nuclei from the NU method are calculated and their structures are determined. Therefore, by using a local potential that is suitable for light nuclei and compatible with the Hafstad-Teller potential, the Schrodinger equation from NU method is solved and the energy levels and wave functions are obtained. For more accuracy, the spin-orbit and tensor potentials are added to the central potential as perturbation and the first-order energy correction is obtained for the different states of many alpha systems. So, we calculate the energy levels of nuclei 8Be and 16O and compare the obtained results with the experimental data and get a good agreement. This agreement is better for 16O than 8Be. Therefore, anybody can conclude that the α cluster model has the better results for the nuclei with the number of more alpha particles. Finally, by the strength of Coulomb’s repulsion, it is shown that the ground and first excited states of the 16O nucleus have the tetrahedral and square configurations, respectively. Also, it is obtained that the structures of the second and third excited states are as square and linear chain that these structures show the non-localized gas configuration for the higher excited states of 16O nucleus.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Considering the Light Nuclei in the Cluster Model from NU Method AU - Sahar Aslanzadeh AU - Mohammad Reza Shojaei AU - Ali Asghar Mowlavi Y1 - 2019/01/23 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11 DO - 10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11 T2 - World Journal of Applied Physics JF - World Journal of Applied Physics JO - World Journal of Applied Physics SP - 54 EP - 60 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6008 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjap.20180304.11 AB - In this work, the energy levels of light nuclei from the NU method are calculated and their structures are determined. Therefore, by using a local potential that is suitable for light nuclei and compatible with the Hafstad-Teller potential, the Schrodinger equation from NU method is solved and the energy levels and wave functions are obtained. For more accuracy, the spin-orbit and tensor potentials are added to the central potential as perturbation and the first-order energy correction is obtained for the different states of many alpha systems. So, we calculate the energy levels of nuclei 8Be and 16O and compare the obtained results with the experimental data and get a good agreement. This agreement is better for 16O than 8Be. Therefore, anybody can conclude that the α cluster model has the better results for the nuclei with the number of more alpha particles. Finally, by the strength of Coulomb’s repulsion, it is shown that the ground and first excited states of the 16O nucleus have the tetrahedral and square configurations, respectively. Also, it is obtained that the structures of the second and third excited states are as square and linear chain that these structures show the non-localized gas configuration for the higher excited states of 16O nucleus. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -